For people like me, this means that we can now find ourselves deported as a result of having held up a sign to do with climate change. For example because it inconveniences someone who may now have to walk or drive around you.
Want a comparison of the legal reasoning in this case?
In a trial prosecuting someone who went berserk because he found his wife cheating on him, the latter cannot be mentioned while addressing the jury.
Another example could be that if you chased a burglar with a frying pan and the burglar ended up with a broken wrist and ripped clothes when he climbed your fence to get away, he can now force you to say nothing about the burglar part while addressing the jury in the trial in which you are prosecuted for having clobbered him with the frying pan.
