Homelessness in Amsterdam

Amsterdam’s approach to homelessness

I think that Amsterdam’s approach of homelessness does not work. One reason is that cause and effect of factors that feature in homelessness get confused. By that, I mean that I believe that what is often seen as a cause is actually a result, for example a result of the failing approach. Another reason is that the efforts are largely cosmetic in my view and don’t necessarily do much to alleviate the suffering of homeless people, let alone remedy and prevent homelessness.

I suspect that there often is a subconscious assumption that there are so many things “wrong” with homeless people that their homelessness is basically a given. I feel that homelessness is often being supported, rather than homeless people. People end up exhausted and devalued, and are left without hope.

Particularly also the current measures being taken at Amsterdam’s Central Station are very concerning, in my view. They also impact travellers and NS staff negatively.

The huge impact of sleep deprivation – a fixed component of homelessness – appears to get completely overlooked. First, people will start functioning at the level of being drunk, but sleep deprivation also often causes sour moods (depression), hallucinations and psychosis. These are the result of homelessness, not the cause. Therein lies the key to dealing with homelessness, I believe.

Amsterdam’s mayor

I just read that Amsterdam’s mayor Femke Halsema has very recently said she wants to reexamine Amsterdam’s homelessness policy:
https://www.parool.nl/amsterdam/waarom-krijgen-buiten-slapende-daklozen-nog-steeds-boetes-halsema-wil-beleid-tegen-licht-houden-daklozen-beschermen-en-overlast-tegengaan~b6af637f/

However, she appears to have said more or less the same in 2021:
https://www.at5.nl/nieuws/206600/halsema-vindt-beboeten-van-slapende-daklozen-beschamend

I conclude that little or nothing has changed and I wonder how committed Halsema really is. Her comments reflect conservative right-wing politics, not at traditional views from the left. She’s still with GroenLinks, however. 

Time for positive change

I have several ideas for how we could accomplish a turnaround in this area. Some of these also convey the human right to housing; as I am sure you know, the United Nations believe that the Netherlands is not doing too well in this area.

  • I propose capsule housing as a way to help prevent homelessness and remedy existing homelessness by bringing people’s expenses down. This might be done by using empty office buildings (https://openresearch.amsterdam/image/2024/10/28/monitor_kantoren_1_januari_2024.pdf). The conversion of empty office buildings into traditional housing is expensive and often stalls for that reason. By contrast, converting existing buildings for capsule housing might not only cost a lot less, the capsules should and would be removable, conferring a great deal of flexibility. 
  • The official day and night shelters are pitiful and limited and largely cosmetic. Access is very limited, in every conceivable way. It also forces people who are already exhausted to traipse all over Amsterdam.
  • There should be small-scale facilities all over town where people can keep a few belongings. This could be with host families (for example their bicycle storage “box”) or with public libraries, but other solutions are possible. I myself have been homeless for nearly five months, mostly in Amsterdam, and I get so exhausted dragging all my stuff with me wherever I go, even if it is just for a snack from the supermarket. It would be so lovely if I could just leave my suitcases somewhere for an afternoon and know that they will still be there when I get back. 
  • There need to be far more stable (!) and easily accessible (!) sleeping places all over town. This would need to be managed well, in terms of cleaning and maintenance; letting specific homeless people look after these solutions might work really well. Toronto has a project with transportable tiny homes (https://tinytinyhomes.ca/contact-us/ and https://www.gofundme.com/f/tiny-tiny-homes-affordable-housing-solutions). Personally, I do not see them as a breakthrough, but the project does raise awareness for the issue and gets people involved. Portsmouth and London in the UK have converted buses into flexible shelters and that could be a good solution for Amsterdam. I would also like to see capsules installed at or near Central Station to ensure that people get enough sleep (to tackle problematic behaviours) and stay warm. Homeless people could be issued with an electronic pass for free access to 75% of these capsules; the remaining 25% could be accessed at a fee of EUR 10, 12.50 or 15. This way, you avoid competition with hostels, and on the other hand, when the 75% are occupied people who are desperate for a good night’s sleep won’t mind paying a small fee and won’t feel the lack of capacity as acutely. Of course, the main problem behind homelessness is lack of cash, but if you take a look on for example Reddit, you will see that financially more fortunate Amsterdammers can be quite willing to pay 30 euros or more just so that some stranger does not have to sleep in the streets. What I like about the idea of a project at Central Station is the educational factor. The stigma needs to be addressed and the extreme hardship needs to be explained along with how this affects homeless people why they are not always at their best behaviour and why this calls for compassion rather then rejection and condemnation. 
  • The approach taken at Jan van Galenstraat 323b is dehumanizing and should be thoroughly overhauled. People should not be treated as if they are potentially dangerous terrorists; that’s downright offensive. (I refer you to what I wrote above.) Also, promises should always be laid down in writing to avoid that despicable games get played with homeless people; this erodes trust in democracy and can make people very angry. Also, you get a better response from people if you treat them with normal human respect and dignity than when you treat them like potentially dangerous trash. 

With regard to myself, I am not entitled to any form of support (and I have lost all faith in civil servants when it comes to really depending on their support anyway). My aim is to get myself back on my feet asap, and I set up a GoFundMe to that end at the start of this year. I expected to have accomplished my goal much sooner (before the end of November, even) and I am getting pretty exhausted. I am a Dutch citizen, but I am formally based in the UK.  

I have seen and learned a lot in England. Speaking of which, London is also currently starting a major effort to address homelessness (https://www.london.gov.uk/talk-london/topics/housing/rough-sleeping-london/discussions). 

I no longer really know anyone in the Netherlands.

Anything you can do to truly help me would be greatly appreciated, however. (Atypical for me, I quite often find myself close to tears these days.) My main problem is my lack of income, other than donations. I have no savings. My story is not a typical one, but the end result and what needs to be done to remedy the situation is more or less the same as for any other homeless person. It is a matter of cash. Any healing that needs to be done all depends on having financial stability.

I recognize homeless people now – along with a few fake ones – and I see their pain and utter exhaustion, hopelessness and misery. It’s often young males, often wire-thin, but also older males. They all desperately try not to get noticed. It’s HEART-BREAKING, particularly to see the young ones. They are supposed to be our future and if we don’t support them now, we are merely creating tomorrow’s much bigger problems.

When bedroom tax victims are evicted

Last September, the Independent reported that about 50,000 people – mostly disabled – were being threatened with eviction on account of the so-called bedroom tax (a cut in the benefits of those people who need support most, generally). Someone just alerted me to this post about the eviction of Michael Hilton in East Lancashire.

homeIf this account of events is accurate and fairly complete, a violation of the Interference with Good Act 1977 occurred in this case, and under  circumstances that I find repugnant.

The Lancashire Telegraph also reported on this eviction but did not mention the destruction of Mr Hilton’s belongings. I hope that the ‘rifling’ through the skip was done by caring neighbours who tried to salvage some of Mr Hilton’s possessions, if they were indeed disposed of instantly.

To me, the ‘bedroom tax’ sounds like an instrument fitting for a feudal aristocracy as those who are affected by it are often unable to change their circumstances in such a way that they can avoid it. There is an almost feudal relationship between those who impose this astonishingly ridiculous and cruel ‘bedroom tax’ (the government) and the affected persons, but that is not what this post is about.

It is not necessarily true that tenants who appear to ignore eviction notices are burying their heads in the sand. The real reason can be that there is simply very little such tenants can do. There is a general misconception among the public – including police – that tenants who receive an eviction notice can make this ‘go away’ if only they will act.

There is no magical solution called ‘help’ out there. Many councils are unable to do anything for tenants threatened with eviction. The councils can rehouse some of the most vulnerable people, but that appears to be relatively rare. I think it is a fair assumption that anyone who is unable to escape the bedroom tax is equally unable to do something about a subsequent eviction.

The idea of eviction makes most people feel so extremely vulnerable that they distance themselves from other people’s evictions by telling themselves that eviction could never happen to them. They, after all, would act if it ever happened to them. That assumption is wrong. Eviction can happen to anyone. If it were to happen to you, you might find yourself just as powerless and just as distraught as Mr Hilton, certainly if you’d been living in your home as long as Mr Hilton had. 30 years.

In all fairness, Hyndburn Homes appears to be trying to do what it can, but it is a bit hard to tell from a distance. I am finding them very communicative, though, and that is usually a good sign. I have asked for concrete examples of solutions Hyndburn Homes finds together with tenants. Seeing what is possible might help diminish the number of tenants who seemingly refuse offers of support and ‘choose not to work with’ housing associations.

When you’re very stressed, which is almost always the case when you’re about to be kicked out of your home, it becomes very hard to see solutions. All you likely still see is a giant wall of problems closing in on you. I too would like to know what solutions housing associations are able to offer. Because many people – tenants and housing associations alike – need that inspiration.