Copy of email that just went out to someone in the US – with update

(Sorry, the whitespace disappeared when I pasted both texts.)

___

About Dutch social security benefits…YES, if you go online, there is a lot of information that makes it look like getting basic benefits is easy. What’s lacking is the small print and local policy. People who live in the Netherlands and don’t depend on them are convinced it’s easy and wonderful. That fancy-background Karen woman with the heaps of dough and her deceased dad’s best friend thought so too. She went online, figuring I had suddenly become retarded and concluded that she had it all figured out. She thought that I might even be able to get rent support while living in the bushes. “1400 euro per month. In six months, you’ll have your van.” It’s not easy at all. It’s a frikking nightmare in most municipalities and that includes Amsterdam.I should have known! Because in 2017, after Frank either simply forgot about or reneged on his promises, when he was still living at his previous address – in Amsterdam – without the nasty, now second ex wife, we stopped by at the civic offices and back then, they said that there wasn’t anything that they could do for me. I’d forgotten, frankly. 🫢🙄😬These days, if you have any kind of ties to abroad, including your parents being foreign or having a foreign-sounding name, you’re considered likely to be scheming to defraud the system. So rejecting your application is standard policy in many municipalities. I’ve gotten hassled like crazy again. Some were standing behind me so I couldn’t see how many there were, but up to 6 cops hassled me.This is what appears to have happened. First, a plainclothes dude drove me out of a location that is next to a path so that if they hassle you there, the public witnesses it. He said he had been to prison for 9 years and that he was going to come back and set fire to the whole shebang with me in it. But he talked like a cop!Second, people showed up who said that they were enforcement. In the Netherlands, people in lots of roles don’t need to identify themselves, in order to protect them from the public. You have to take them at their word. I was now at a location where the public just sees a bunch of cops in the distance standing around someone who the public can’t really see.Third, an army of police officers showed up, initially addressed me by a decades old nickname from even before we became acquainted, Julie. Wtf? But they claimed to have been flagged down in their car by a jogger about an unknown woman going haywire (about to brush her teeth and put on her makeup).They stood shouting and lying and twisting my words and their own for nearly two hours (making me postpone an appointment and messing up my planning for the week, taking my injured foot into account). Among other things, they said to me that the previous people hadn’t been enforcement at all. But they later DID refer to them as “enforcement”.They called me an illegal at first, too.And (twice, I think): “You’ll claim benefits here and then you’ll go to Utrecht to claim benefits and then you may go to Belgium.”Later they said that I can get benefits here on the basis of my nearly-10-bucks-per-month postbox address here. That’s utter nonsense. Etc etc.There’s a guy here called frank van der linde who used to be a management consultant, and was in various other organizations/businesses, ran one of them (food-related), then slowly became an activist – as well as a writer and columnist. He wrote about police brutality, racism, arms sales, unhealthy and unsustainable foods etc. He started receiving threats. Neighbors complained that they no longer felt safe. He was told to move out. That’s how HE became homeless.Police declared him both an extremist and a mentally unwell person who should be locked up. (Police here are doing the latter to me as well, not the former as far as I’m aware, just because I dare criticize public policy and local approaches to among other things homelessness, just like that van der linde guy).But the question remains: Why did they address me by that decades-old nickname? I started using that when I was 11 or 12 because of a stupid song by a popular singer called Peter Koelewijn. That nickname started disappearing since 1981 and I dropped it formally in 1994. There’s a local very silly, petty woman who I told about that nickname. It’s possible that it was somewhere in a police computer s

UPDATE

This, below, is what I wrote to the police. They got back to me. It wasn’t them.

___

Dag,Ik ben op 26 augustus 2026 rond 8, 9 uur in de ochtend een kleine twee uur lastig gevallen door vier tot zes Amsterdamse politieagenten. Ik heb daardoor een afspraak elders moeten verplaatsen naar een andere dag. Er gebeurde daarbij iets heel vreemds. Dat is de reden dat ik contact opneem. (Dat vertel ik zo.) Dit was duidelijk personally targeted harassment, bleek daaruit. Wat zit daarachter? Drie mogelijkheden: 1) targeted harassment van de politie ivm mijn social justice activisme of 2) targeted harassment van een Belgische mevrouw (An Desmet) met een vreemde obsessie naar mij toe die in maart of april van dit jaar uit de hand begon te lopen of 3) targeted harassment van een Belgische mevrouw (An Desmet) aangestuurd door een vriendin van haar (Sandra) die toevallig heeft gewerkt voor met name één bepaalde gemeentelijke instantie waar ik in het verleden kritiek op heb geleverd. Van die vriendin (Sandra) van die Belgische mevrouw heb ik in 2025 overlast ervaren, maar een en ander was behoorlijk zielig en onbenullig. Ik heb er nooit over gesproken, maar met succes alle contact acuut afgekapt. Ik was destijds wel kort bezorgd dat ik deze dame (Sandra) niet op een afstand zou kunnen houden. Ze schijnt nog twee keer haar hengeltje te hebben uitgeslagen, via haar vriendin mw Desmet. Dat heb ik toen straal genegeerd. Ik heb beide dames na het afkappen van alle contacten met elk niet meer gezien. Mevrouw Desmet heb ik in pakweg mei 2025 voor het eerst ontmoet. Een tijd daarna benaderde ze me op haar werk (OBA) toen ze me daar opeens herkende. Ze speelt geen rol in mijn leven. Haar vriendin is ook voor mij een wildvreemde. Aan u om dit op te volgen.UITLEG De agenten beweerden door een jogger in hun auto te zijn gestopt ivm mij, iemand die ze niet kenden. Ze benaderden me echter door me aan te spreken met een nickname die ik decennia geleden had (sinds zesde klas lagere school, maar vanaf 1981 langzaam verdwijnend en in 1994 formeel vervangen). Heel vreemd. Die Belgische mevrouw (An Desmet) heb ik over die nickname verteld. Toen ik die nickname nog gebruikte, heb ik ooit de politie in Amsterdam gebeld ivm met een diefstal van een auto die op dat moment leek plaats te vinden aan de Gillis van Ledenberchstraat. Eind of midden jaren 80 was dat. Die nickname zou dus ook in jullie systemen kunnen zitten. Hier klopt dus iets niet. Als dat niet duidelijk is, hoor ik het graag. Bedankt voor de moeite.

Does this mean that I should file a crime report for targeted harassment by Ms D?

Further to my discussion with the City of Amsterdam

29 October 2025: I followed it up with a message explaining that I understand that they probably see me as a pain in the behind. Ms Engelhard didn’t reply to that either.

Let’s face it. A) The city permanently shut its doors to me in December 2024 and B) the fact that the city doesn’t even provide something as utterly basic as toilets probably says it all. They are not interested in remedying issues. They are just into cosmetics.

See also this research done at the University of Amsterdam. It’s a chapter in The Routledge Handbook of Global Perspectives on Homelessness, Law & Policy (pp. 175-187). Published in 2024. People went undercover, pretending to be homeless, as part of this research.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003274056-12

https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/180146235/10.4324_9781003274056-12_chapterpdf.pdf

(copy and paste if you don’t trust links)


This is a follow-up to this previous post:
https://angelinasouren.com/2025/10/14/my-ongoing-discussion-with-the-city-of-amsterdam/
See also: https://angelinasouren.com/homelessnessness-in-the-netherlands/

Note that Ms Engelhard did not deny that the City’s behind the intimidation. (This may be why: Homeless people in Amsterdam are no longer fined, as of 13 June 2025. That is in theory. Have the regulations been updated or was this more empty waffling? https://www.dedaklozenvakbond.nl/2025/06/13/geen-boetes-meer/)

Looks like it: https://decorrespondent.nl/16264/buiten-moeten-slapen-dat-is-geen-overtreding-maar-een-onrecht/7774e412-2a4a-0572-05fd-b77458dbf41f There is still a large number of fines that can be imposed on homeless people (and my sense of what was happening around me was that it was geared toward being able to impose at least one on me; I haven’t stated what has been happening and what else I’ve been observing and that’s on purpose).

No, I am – clearly – no longer in negotiating mode or trying to keep anyone at the City of Amsterdam particularly happy. I am being cantankerous, from their point of view. I get that. Personally, I have very little to no faith left in these municipal circuses and the money-making industry that surrounds it. That’s now irrepairable.

I do understand why the municipality sees me as a pain in the behind but I’ve also contacted a different Dutch municipality about its homelessness challenges and took part in a discussion on the topic for London as well.

If I can help push through some improvements, with or without my cousin* pushing from the other side, then I might be quite happy.

(This cousin runs a large real estate undertaking in the mid-market housing segment – and in investing – so he might need to set up an extra company, which in itself is no big deal but entering a very different market segment would be. However, he could still push without doing that and he could also implement changes to existing practices because his existing tenants can easily be impacted too. I’d like to see him use empty office buildings that are too expensive to turn into “proper” apartments, such as the one in Amsterdam Zuid-Oost that I read about – possibly the former ING building? – for capsule housing. You could have two forms: Pods for currently homeless people – because you don’t sleep much at all in a hall with lots of mattresses on the floor and similar places – and larger capsules for young people who can’t afford a bloody fortune in rent but would like to be able to save. The real estate sector has a crappy reputation. My cousin could do break-even projects as a show of corporate responsibility. I know he would have to convince others too. He’s not Donald Trump. I know that. But where there is a will, there is a way. Maybe he can start a consortium with other real estate firms that would like to change the sector.)

The Netherlands is gridlocked in a crazy mess of regulations. That, too, needs to change urgently.
De volkomen bezopen waanzin van de Nederlandse hokjesgeest en verstikkende regelziekte… Lees dit: De regels versimpelen voor AOW’ers die willen samenwonen, scheelt de overheid potentieel honderden miljoenen. En er komen jaarlijks honderden tot duizenden extra woningen vrij.

No, I had not asked Ms Engelhard for help in March, but I was hungry and had called one of those centers where people in my situation are supposed to be able to get a meal, shower and do laundry (at a small fee). Their opening hours are limited and the need is FAR BIGGER than what these centers are still able to offer in terms of capacity. So far, Mayor Femke Halsema has been adamant that she won’t offer more support.

When I called this center, I was told that it was only available for people who were already registered there.

At the end of the call, I asked Ms Engelhard where I might be able to get a meal and I told her about this. Somehow, Ms Engelhard knew which center (inloophuis) I was talking about. I don’t know how she knew.

She informed me that I would be able to get a meal at a location that turned out to be west of Sloterplas, at about 7 kilometers (from where I was at the time, I think, which was east of Central Station). She mentioned a specific time.

I told her that I would not be able to make it.

I googled it later and it was a center for men, it said online, but I’ve found that the online information as to where and when you can find resources is often non-existent or contradictory.

Anyway, this wasn’t doable for me. I was dragging two suitcases and a heavy underseat cabin bag along with me. I already was exhausted.

One thing that the city definitely has to do if it continues on its course of sending people to the fringes of town all the time is give them (storage facilities, anyway, and) a public transport pass. If the City gives you a registered address, for example, then you’re obliged to go to the far Nieuw West once a week at a specific time, off the top of my head. Otherwise you will lose the address.

There are conditions tied to the benefits too that I can no longer meet. Ms Engelhard said that it would not take me that long to find new living quarters, but I reckon it would take 15 to 20 years.

Below are the two texts I had sent to the mayor. I think that these are the exact same versions, but there might be minor differences.

I was still in the middle of learning how to do homelessness. Sleep deprivation is such a huge factor initially that you quickly realize that it is vital to get enough sleep. (That is not an issue at all for me any longer.) After that, you discover that rain is actually the biggest problem. The worries about people freezing to death mostly concern the image of city councils etc. You can learn how to deal with cold, but rain makes you miserable, wet and muddy and powerless. There is very little you can do about it. Toilets are an issue too. There are almost no public toilets in Amsterdam. Most are for men only and even the ones for men are only for, eh, number 1?

I just also emailed the town of Beverwijk about its homelessness problem, btw. I sent them this link: https://www.lekkertehuur.nl/

Sleep deprivation, hunger and utter physical exhaustion – along with anger about getting treated like trash or like terrorists – are behind the symptoms that get homeless people vilified.


Anyway, with regard to what happened in December 2024: I tend to think of what happened as the result of me having emigrated to England in 2004, but I was in fact informed that the issue was that I hadn’t been staying in a tent or car but on someone’s couch.

Unfortunately, there’s nobody who can sign off as to whether or not you’ve been on the street (and there’s probably no form for it either). It was my understanding that I had to be on someone’s couch, perhaps so that someone could sign off. They said that there was an arrangement with the Amsterdam suburb that I was in at the time. Amsterdam runs over into it; there is no unbuilt environment in between.

I have a feeling that if I’d stayed in a tent, I’d have been told yet some other reason as to why I didn’t qualify.

Continue reading